The Racially Adjusted Bodycount Index

A shocking new incel technology

This post starts off with what I put on Twitter and then continues on with a bunch of added commentary after the bolded line. If you already read the initial post, you might wanna skip to bold.

Twitter loves bodycount talk, but it's been the same thing for ages now. This is possibly the one field in which incel technology has completely stagnated - they've developed theories of relativity relating to age gaps in relationships, coded AI wives and managed to reverse balding by now, but they're still doing the same bodycount thing.

I haven't seen Oppenheimer, but to my understanding it was about a guy who invented nuclear bombs and then irresponsibly gave them away. I find that beautiful and inspirational

My atomic bomb, gifted to whoever wants it: the Racially Adjusted Bodycount Index.

In the right hands, I think my Racially Adjusted Bodycount Index (RABI) could be the technological innovation bodycount discourse needs to start advancing again.

Normal people have always maintained: "Women are so much more than their bodycount! Reducing them down to a single number like this is evil!"

Intuitively, we all knew this to be true. But without proper experience around women (females?) we didn't understand what other elements might be missing from the equation. I spent 9 years pretending to be a woman online to fill that experience gap and I've used what I learned to flesh out the concept for my RABI.

It turns out men *do* care about more than just a woman's bodycount. Based on my 9 year of research, what men care about isn't just the number of men a woman's slept with - it's the RACES of the men she's slept with.

This matters far more than the absolute number of past partners, and explains why some women seem "blown out" (industry term) at thirty bodies while others can seem pure and virginal even at ten thousand.

I spent time building a platform of normal and well-adjusted followers to conduct research on. When their poll results started flowing in, the world around me immediately made more sense.

It explained why black women are the least swiped on dating apps - they predominantly sleep with black men, who my RABI says cause the most destruction

This also gets to the heart of why men may find Asian women desirable - they sleep with Asian men, who my RABI tells me barely count as half a person each

Knowing this, we can all finally agree that reducing a woman down to a single number *is* evil. To accurately reduce a woman, you must consult my RABI, which denominates in terms of white men:

Asian bodies count as .67

White bodies count as 1

Hispanic bodies count as 2

Indian bodies count as 4

Arab bodies count at 6.67

Black bodies count as 15

These numbers were all determined by asking questions like below, and iterating the ratio till the poll results got close to 50/50.

I'm not sure what their p-value is, but I have a lot of followers now, so it should be pretty high.

ADDENDUM

I've been asked a lot of questions about my research methods, and in the spirit of transparency I'd like to answer them here:

Q: Lukas, what if your Twitter followers aren't representative of the overall population?

A: Simply no way that could be true

Q: Wouldn't these results also depend on the race of the girl in question, and the person answering the poll? What did you do to control for those?

A: If those variables were truly as important as you say, they should know how to control for themselves

Q: Can't people just buy bots and destroy your polls?

A: Bot votes are just as valid as real votes. Think about it - someone willing to pay for 1000 votes clearly cares about the results 1000x more than you do, and my research should validate their feelings.

Initial post ends here. Thoughts on the comments BELOW and occasionally in my Telegram Channel.

I was really proud of everything that went into this one, but most of the beauty was hidden a bit.

For starters, making the acronym “RABI” was hilarious to me because of the way it would be used. “My rabbi says you’re ran through,” “My rabbi says black people are much worse,” etc. Abdication of all responsibility to a hypothetical racist rabbi made me laugh a lot while I was writing.

The second easter egg was the way I got the votes I needed. Starting the poll thread with the question I used and including no indication that the replies would have questions involving other races was guaranteed to go viral enough I could force the thing into the mainstream. I had to make it really uneven too, such that the first option would have way more votes even though the girl had way fewer bodies, otherwise people wouldn’t quote-tweet it saying “Wooahhh! This is so crazy man!” or doing their racial antics.

All this worked to get 30k votes on the poll and 5M impressions, which was another piece of hilarity — that pushes it well into the realm of actual statistical significance.

This basically acts as an amplifier on how funny the results are. If this was a 400 vote twitter poll, people would just disregard it, but it getting 30k votes meant it wasn’t really something you can ignore. The extremely adept can probably cope their way out of it by telling themselves it was just one guy’s racist twitter followers, but most reasonable people understand 30k voted and 5M impressions is simply far too large to be written off as a statistical anomaly.

A funny unintended consequence was all the data scientist seethe in the comments. They spent their entire last quarter trying to secure funding for a well-controlled 500-person survey, and some dipshit on twitter makes a racist poll that he calls “research” and 100x more people see and acknowledge my thing than theirs. It’s like their worst nightmare.

It also hilariously got a bunch of retards asking questions like this, which wasn’t intended because I never would have imagined people could be this stupid, but was really funny nonetheless:

Another funny thing I realized is that Hispanic and Latino likely would have had different results, despite the fact I have no idea what differentiates them. Just based on social sense, I think it should have been about 4 for whatever people associate with “Mexican,” while whatever they associate with “Spaniard” might’ve approached 1.5. Lots of people wanted to know what it’d look like for Italians — I speculate it may even be over 20.

There was obviously also a lot of racial seethe, too. People were quick to make it about penises, but that was wrong IMO. Indians and arabs have much smaller penises than average and people still had large issues with them as exes vs the others. I generally regard the people responding with stuff about penises as either porn-brained or racial activists. Even if you think it has some level of input, there’s no way it’s the primary or even secondary effect. This becomes especially obvious below.

When we get to the questions themselves, the way I framed them was such that the average reader assumed a couple things:

— The girl in question was white.

and

— The fact that the girl had only slept with guys of x race meant that she was only attracted to people of that race.

It was essentially a poll on how deranged white girls who prefer other races of men were, with a little bodycount coating on the outside to disguise it.

I did a final poll a few days after to prove that’s what was going on (and also dispel the goofy shit about this being entirely about penises. Nobody is threatened by the penises that have been involved with a virgin because those penises don’t exist).

So even in the case where the girl was a virgin (which is btw some sort of holy grail for the bodycount truthers) she lost to a girl with a few bodies just for the preference.

Basically, the initial polls tested 2 major effects while pretending it was just 1.

The first was the effect of bodycount, and the second was the effect of a girl preferring one outgroup race specifically.

The results get a lot less surprising then, and the equations used to model them would be different than implied in my initial post. It’s less about actual bodycount and more about the preference for an outgroup race.

This is a fairly non-controversial take that there seemed to be multi-ethnic unity on:

It’s one thing if a person just dates whoever and there’s a bunch of different races in their past, but when you find an asian girl who only dates arabs, or an arab girl who only dates indians, or any other combination of unlike-unlike, they’re really weird people. Not all of them theoretically, but in practice every single person I know like that is a total nut. And even if they aren’t nuts — if you’re clearly not their type, why would you want to date them?

In the end though, all these misleading polls and virality they generated were towards an end — changing the bodycount discourse.

I don’t even really care what it gets changed to, I’m just really bored of it having been the same thing ever since I’ve had internet.

I understand why it’s been this way, though — rhetoric doesn’t adapt without pressure, and nobody’s successfully pushed back on bodycount rhetoric. The best the opposition came up with was “That’s not real, nobody actually cares about bodycount in real life! You’re just insecure! Log off!”

Calling people “insecure” when they’re imposing a standard on you just feels impotent, especially when they frequently agree with you.

“Okay, sure, I’d be insecure having a girlfriend who’s had sex with 1000 dudes because I have low sexual experience myself. What does that change? I still don’t want it.”

Most people are also too insecure to let other men have sex with their wife, so they remain monogamous. Everyone has their limits, and trying to gaslight people into accepting things they’re uncomfortable with by pretending nobody else agrees with them just feels stupid.

It’s clear guys all have a different level of disgust response towards women’s past partners — some genuinely do not care at all, and others have an extremely negative reaction on a lizard-brain level. A lot probably have no disgust response at all and are mostly concerned with the social consequences.

My mostly-serious stance on bodycount goes something like this:

Younger guys are more autistic than ever before while also having less sexual experience than ever before. They’re looking for a quantifiable metric by which they can measure the quality of women because they have no idea what’s going on, many don’t trust themselves to discern whether or not a woman actually loves them or if they’re just getting memed.

Hopefully the polls get people to understand that even if you’re approaching this from a hyper-autistic quantifiable standpoint, there are better metrics to use. Here, we see the effect of race matters way more than the bodycount itself. There are a lot of other things like this — drug use, parental income, etc. I’m sure people can dig them up and repackage them into their own adjusted metrics.

The important thing to me is that it keeps being referred to as “bodycount,” even when the thing measured isn’t bodycount at all. Like here, the primary effect is mostly about race, but I’m still calling it a bodycount index — I think as the things measured get farther and farther away from actual bodycount, it just gets funnier. Hopefully soon we can be calling virgins ran-through because their bodycount indexes are 50000 due to only reposting pictures of Arab Sheikhs with heart-eye emojis or something. I can’t wait for the future.